Theory of differing local and national voter choice
$2.95
psychology
presentation
published 16/07/2008
review : Completed
level : General public
requested 0 times
This paper aims to critique Downss Economic Theory of Political Action in Democracy with experimental research that supports and refutes the assumptions and results of his model. First, I look at if legislators policy making decisions are ideologically fixed or susceptible to constituent preferences. Next, I consider if voter choice in incumbency races is dependant on the incumbents performance during their previous term. Then I examine the rationality of voting, specifically the assumption that all voters are self interested. Based on my findings in these areas I conclude that there are different mechanisms for local election and national elections.
Table of Contents
- Introduction.
- The effect of voter preference on legislator policy decisions - 2003 California Recall.
- Do the voters actually care about past performance?
- The 2000 school board election in South Carolina.
- Downs's theory on the rationality of being informed.
